In-house vs outsourcing: making the right recruitment choice
What is the difference between in-house and outsourcing?
What is in-house recruitment?
In-house recruitment means your internal Talent Acquisition and HR teams handle everything related to hiring. From posting job ads and sourcing candidates to conducting interviews and onboarding new employees, all recruitment activities happen within your organisation.
This approach gives you direct oversight and makes it easy to align new hires with your company’s culture and values. However, it also comes with significant time and resource commitments. You’ll need experienced professionals, the right recruitment tools, and ongoing training to keep your internal team effective.
What is recruitment outsourcing?
Outsourcing recruitment involves working with an external provider to manage part or all of the recruitment process. This can range from hiring an agency to fill specific roles to engaging a full-service provider through Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO).
RPO is a long-term partnership where the provider becomes an extension of your internal team, taking full responsibility for recruitment from start to finish. That includes writing job descriptions, sourcing candidates, interviewing, and even onboarding.
By outsourcing, companies gain access to wider talent networks, specialised industry knowledge, and cutting-edge recruitment technology - benefits that are often out of reach with smaller inhouse teams.
Understanding the cost of outsourcing vs in-house recruitment
The cost of outsourcing vs in-house recruitment is one of the most critical factors in deciding which model is best for your organisation.
Running recruitment in-house involves fixed costs such as salaries, recruitment software licenses, internal training, and sometimes even overheads from maintaining a larger team. While this model can work well for organisations with steady hiring needs and robust internal capabilities, it may become inefficient if hiring is inconsistent or grows suddenly.
Outsourcing, on the other hand, typically involves variable costs, such as service fees based on the number or complexity of hires. These fees can often be offset by the efficiency, speed, and expertise an external provider brings. Additionally, outsourcing can reduce the need for investment in internal systems or staff training, saving both time and money over the long term.
It’s important to evaluate not just the upfront costs, but also the value each option provides in terms of hiring success, candidate quality, and operational efficiency.
How to decide between outsourcing or in-house recruitment
When choosing between outsourcing or in-house recruitment, consider the following:
- Hiring Volume & Frequency: Do you recruit consistently year-round, or are your needs more project-based or seasonal? Outsourcing can offer flexibility to scale up or down as needed.
- Internal Capabilities: Does your HR or TA team have the time and expertise to handle recruitment effectively, or could an external partner help you move faster?
- Level of Control: Are you comfortable delegating parts of the hiring process, or do you prefer complete oversight and involvement?
- Brand Experience: Consistency in candidate experience and alignment with your employer brand can be maintained with both approaches but may require more effort internally.
Ultimately, your decision should be guided by your business goals, available resources, and the talent landscape you're operating in.
Deciding between in-house and outsourcing recruitment is about more than just cost - it’s about finding the right fit for your business, now and in the future. If you're scaling into new regions, facing complex hiring challenges, or simply want to improve your recruitment outcomes, outsourcing could offer the expertise and adaptability you need. On the other hand, a strong in-house team can be a valuable asset for organisations looking to build and maintain a deeply aligned company culture.
At Robert Walters Outsourcing, we partner with businesses across the globe to deliver tailored recruitment solutions - whether that means fully outsourced RPO services or support on a project-by-project basis. If you’re weighing the options between outsourcing or in-house hiring, we’re here to help you make an informed decision that aligns with your goals.
Get in touch with our expert team here.
-
When to consider outsourcing recruitment?
There are many points in business where outsourcing your recruitment strategy may be the best move for your organisation. Suppose you have a short-term project coming up with immediate need for a team your in-house team already has business as usual tasks to keep up with and cannot set this team up. In that case, Robert Walters Project RPO solution provides a rapid response to your one-off or short to medium-term talent demands. We can implement an effective hiring process within six weeks. -
What is the difference between RPO and contingent workforce solutions (CWS)?
Simply put, RPO relates to permanent hiring where your provider will manage the full end to end recruitment cycle or just specific parts of the cycle. Contingent Workforce Solutions (CWS) is a service offering to support the delivery and management of non-permanent or contract resources. RPO is often a solution for long-term hiring strategies, whilst CWS offers your organisation flexibility for shorter-term or project-based hiring. Together, they offer comprehensive and highly flexible solutions to all your talent needs. -
What are the benefits of outsourced recruitment solutions?
- Improved quality of hire – RPO providers have access to broader talent pools and advanced sourcing tools, using data-driven recruitment strategies to identify candidates who are both qualified and a good fit for your company culture.
- Scalability and flexibility – RPO solutions are highly scalable, allowing you to ramp recruitment up or down depending on business needs, for example, hiring spikes, or expansion into a new region.
- Cost efficiency – streamlined processes and technology reduce your time-to-hire and agency fees, reducing overall recruitment costs.
- Technology and innovation – Many RPO providers bring cutting-edge recruitment tech, including AI screening tools and analytics platforms. Robert Walters developed RW Plus, which can be used as an all-in-one tech solution or will integrate seamlessly into your existing systems.
- Enhanced candidate experience – Outsourced recruitment providers deliver consistent and engaging candidate communications to ensure your employer brand is translated through the recruitment process.
Related content
View AllAs uncertain tides continue to rock organisations’ revenues, offshoring has resurfaced as a viable cost optimisation strategy. The previously simple value proposition – hire equivalent talent elsewhere for cheaper - is now far more complex, not least due to the advent of skills-based hiring. Talent
Read MoreThe multigenerational workforce is expanding Navigating the complexities of a multigenerational workforce with shifting values can be challenging. With the workforce now made up of four generations, organisations must be prepared for the shift in work styles and expectations. Understanding Gen Z in
Read MoreWhy recruiters are overwhelmed and top-tier talent is being overlooked. Corporate job postings typically attract an average of 250 applications, underscoring the fierce competition in today’s job market. Candidates, in turn, must submit hundreds of applications to secure a position, often 100 to 200
Read More